Twitter LinkedIn

What does Brexit mean for wildlife trafficking?

Much of our law protecting the environment and the natural world comes from Europe. The extent to which the UK will retain or change this legislation following Brexit hangs in the balance. Whatever the make-up of our Government following the upcoming General Election, it must not be allowed to sacrifice the future of wildlife and the natural world on the altar of trade.

April 2017

Wildlife trafficking is a major issue of concern. Worth an estimated US$20 billion annually, it is widely thought to be the fourth largest form of illegal trade. At least 20,000 elephants are being gunned down by poachers every year for their tusks. Rhinos, tigers, lions, pangolins and a host of other species are in the sights of poachers and traffickers. Organised criminal networks see wildlife as a low risk-high return commodity, and their activities devastate populations of threatened species of animals and plants and may disrupt economic, political and social stability among some of the world’s most vulnerable communities.

While our Government seeks to reassure us that nature is safe in their hands and that they intend to make good on their manifesto commitment to be ‘the first generation to leave the natural environment in a better state than that in which we found it’, its commitment to wildlife and the environment has been brought into question. Defra seems to be backtracking on its 25 year Plan for the Environment. Recent newspaper reports have suggested that action on climate change and illegal wildlife trade might be ‘watered down’ as Britain seeks new trade deals in a post-Brexit world.

Defra and its agencies have also seen swathing cuts to departmental budgets and staff in recent years, and there are serious concerns over whether they are capable of delivering the kind of outcome from Brexit that is critical to the future of our environment and wildlife.

In 2014, the British Government hosted a high-level international conference bringing together global leaders to help eradicate wildlife trafficking and better protect the world’s most iconic species from the threat of extinction. At the summit, Prince William promised delegates that “we will stay the course with you until you succeed”, and the Government published a document emphasising its commitment to ending the illegal wildlife trade.

This conference has been followed by two further meetings in Botswana and Vietnam. London will host the fourth in the series next year.

But in order to be a credible host in 2018, the UK must remain at the forefront of international efforts to tackle the problem. That means ensuring our own rules on wildlife trade are strengthened, not weakened, when we leave the EU. It also means pursuing the policies and committing the resources needed to deal with illegal wildlife trade in our own back yard. Leaked documents suggesting the Government may ‘scale down’ work around wildlife trafficking in favour of ‘trade and growth’ don’t inspire much confidence.

If Britain is to retain credibility as a world leader on this issue, our Government must commit, as a minimum, to transposing all aspects of the EU’s Wildlife Trade Regulations (which go well beyond our international commitments to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in many respects) into UK law when we leave the EU, and fully adopt and implement the EU Action Plan Against Wildlife Trafficking. It must also take decisive action to achieve the ‘total ban on ivory sales’ in the UK, which it promised in its manifesto.

As we go forward into a new, independent era, Britain should seek the highest levels of international protection for wildlife against illegal trade at CITES and other forums, and be prepared to set an example by implementing the strictest of domestic measures.

Perhaps most importantly, Britain must make measurable action on wildlife trafficking a precondition for any trade deals negotiated with other countries post-Brexit, and tie such action to overseas aid.

Our global trading relations will be hugely important to our economic security when we leave the EU. But whatever the make-up of our Government following the upcoming General Election, it must not be allowed to sacrifice the future of wildlife and the natural world on the altar of trade.

Mark Jones

Associate Director, Multilateral Environmental Agreements and UK Wildlife, Born Free Foundation

Find me on twitter @fishvetmj

The opinions expressed in this blog are the author’s and not necessarily those of the wider Link membership.


Start the discussion

Share this page

Share on Facebook   Tweet this   Share on LinkedIn