Twitter LinkedIn

MPs put on ‘Notice for Nature’ as charities warn Planning & Infrastructure Bill could demolish wildlife

  • 28 environmental charities have served a spoof planning notice to MPs, warning that the Planning & Infrastructure Bill is an application to demolish wildlife [1]
  • The coalition is calling on Government to urgently fix the Bill with amendments to uphold wildlife protections and help nature recover at the same time as supporting sustainable development—to make the planning system ‘Wilder By Design’.
  • Writing to charities a year ago, the Deputy Prime Minister said the Government “will not legislate” to amend key nature laws if it would weaken them. In the opinion of the Government’s own nature watchdog, the current bill breaks that promise.
  • Nature loss in the constituencies of Ministers proposing the reforms is also highlighted today.

MPs have today been served spoof planning notices warning that the Government's proposed Planning and Infrastructure Bill will ‘bulldoze environmental protections and demolish nature and local greenspaces’ unless crucial changes are made. Conservationists are also highlighting examples of nature loss in the constituencies of key ministers, drawing attention to the wildlife losses that could be worsened by the Bill.

Charities met the Secretary of State, Steve Reed, last week (Thurs 15 May) where they warned that the Bill as it stands would break Government nature commitments. Following this, 28 charities, including the RSPB, the National Trust, The Wildlife Trusts, the Mammal Society, People’s Trust for Endangered Species, and Wildlife and Countryside Link have mailed the spoof notices to all English MPs and Ministers, including the Prime Minister and Secretaries of State, Steve Reed, and Angela Rayner. Environmentalists are calling for MPs to support amendments that will deliver a planning system which works for nature, communities and sustainable development for generations to come. [2]

In July 2024, the Deputy Prime Minister wrote to nature charities to say that the Government would not legislate to amend nature protections in a way that would weaken environmental law. According to the Office for Environmental Protection, environmental lawyers, and nature experts, the Government is now breaking that promise with the current version of the Bill and it must be amended.

England is currently facing a nature crisis, with 1 in 6 British species at risk of extinction, a 32% decrease in wildlife populations since 1970 and the UK among the worst 10% globally for nature loss, alongside 40% less greenspace in new developments compared to older housing. That crisis is being played out across the country. From Steve Reed’s Streatham and Croydon constituency seeing notable losses of butterflies and common birds like the blue tit, to Angela Rayner’s constituency in Greater Manchester seeing a 90% decline in recorded insect species, charities warn that the Bill risks speeding up the loss of nature and disappearance of community greenspaces.[3]

In Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ Leeds West and Pudsey constituency just 1 out of 7 SSSIs in the area is in favourable condition. 1 in 5 species across Yorkshire have declined by more than 25% in the last 30 years: including swifts declining by 50% and red squirrels by 69%.

Secretary of State Steve Reed’s constituency of Streatham and Croydon North, has seen records of small tortoiseshell butterflies drop to just 10 a year, compared to over 200 a year during the 1990s, and common bird species like Blue tits are down more than 10% in the last 20 years. Water voles have largely disappeared from this and other London constituencies with just a handful of river sites where they can be found.

In the Ashton-under-Lyne constituency of Angela Rayner, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government: records of Great spotted woodpeckers have decreased by 68% since 2007 and Song thrush by 68% since 2008. The last inspection of the Hollinwood Branch Canal SSSI protected nature sites found they were in a declining condition. The Huddersfield Narrow Canal SSSI was also found to be in an unfavourable condition.

Richard Benwell, CEO of Wildlife & Countryside Link, said:
“As it stands, the Planning Bill is set to demolish legal protection for nature and pave the way for destruction of wildlife. So far, the proposals are a mile away from the Government’s aim for a win-win for nature and development. Even the Government’s nature watchdog agrees that it would damage environmental protection.

"It's disappointing that Government rejected constructive amendments that could put the Bill back on firm foundations for nature protection and greener development. But we heard Ministers acknowledge the case for change and now we urge them to follow up with quick and decisive fixes for the Bill's serious flaws. Without major improvements, Parliament should reject these damaging proposals.”

Beccy Speight, RSPB chief executive, said:
“This should have been a once in a generation opportunity to create a planning system that helps restore nature at scale while delivering for communities and the economy. Instead, promises from the UK Government have been kicked into the long grass and we’ve been left with a Bill that as currently drafted risks species extinction, irreversible habitat loss and threatens legally binding Environment Act targets. Handing developers a license to destroy precious habitats and species for a fee is not what was promised, and certainly not what our natural world and the people of this country need and deserve. If the UK Government is to maintain a shred of credibility on the environment we must see substantial amends to part three of this Bill without delay.”

Hilary McGrady, Director-General of the National Trust, said:
“With the right planning laws in place, we can restore our dwindling wildlife, increase the green spaces near where people live and build much-needed new homes surrounded by great nature. But as it currently stands, the Bill risks doing the very reverse, as the Government’s own nature watchdog has pointed out.

“The question for the Chancellor and the Prime Minister is do they want to be remembered as the Government that brought nature back into millions of people’s lives? Or do they want to further deprive current and future generations of this essential, universal need?”

James Cooper, Head of External Affairs at Woodland Trust, said:
“The Government’s Planning and Infrastructure Bill risks taking an axe to our natural environment. In its current form, it could fatally undermine decades-old protections, including those of ancient trees and woods, which are already in need of better protection.

“Public outrage over the felling of treasured trees like the Sycamore Gap and Whitewebbs Oak shows just how important green spaces are to people. Nature is a necessity - not a blocker to be dealt with. The Government urgently needs to rethink its bill and put woods, trees and wildlife at the heart of its reforms, delivering the win-win it promised. This means embedding nature in planning so that everyone can benefit from it – regardless of where they live.”

The warning comes as the Planning Bill moves to Report Stage, a final opportunity for MPs to amend the bill before it progresses to the House of Lords. The coalition fears that the Bill in its current form would severely weaken existing environmental protections and lead to the decline or destruction of UK wildlife, wild places and green spaces in communities, with no guarantee of local environmental improvements in return for new development.

In their notice, the coalition reiterated their warning that the Government’s proposals would leave essential protection for wildlife and local neighbourhoods without the scientific safeguards, the delivery guarantees, or the positive plans for nature recovery that could justify such serious risks. Essential safeguards like the Habitats Regulations could be critically weakened. The Government’s own advisors, the Office for Environmental Protection recently concluded that the Bill constitutes regression on environmental legal protections.

In April the coalition wrote to Secretary of State Steve Reed and Minister Mathew Pennycook warning of the urgent changes needed to the Government’s Planning and Infrastructure Bill to avoid complete extinction of species and destruction of the natural spaces that millions of people depend on for their health and wellbeing.

The organisations want to see the government commit to supporting amendments which will ensure that the Bill does not leave nature. This includes a commitment to:

  • Guarantee results: The current law demands a high level of legal and scientific certainty for environmental outcomes. However the Bill only requires outcomes to be “likely”. Government must ensure benefits are delivered and clearly outweigh harm.
  • Avoid harm: Existing rules require developers to avoid damage to protected wildlife. The Bill drops this in favour of a “pay to pollute” model. Future planning rules must ensure that harm must be avoided wherever possible.
  • Follow the science: Environmental Delivery Plans should only apply to new protected features where there's solid scientific evidence they work.
  • Make planning Wilder By Design: We need a legal duty for Councils to help meet climate and nature targets, strong national and marine plans, and low-cost, nature-friendly design like bee and bird bricks in new developments.

ENDS

Notes to Editors:

  1. The full spoof planning notice can be found here. Signatories include: Amphibian and Reptile Conservation, Bat Conservation Trust, British Mountaineering Council, Butterfly Conservation, Buglife, Campaign for National Parks, CPRE (The Countryside Charity), Cornwall Seal Group Research Group Trust, Earth Trust, Earthwatch Europe, Friends of the Earth, Froglife, The Institute of Fisheries Management, Mammal Society, Open Spaces Society, People’s Trust for Endangered Species, The Rivers Trust, RSPB, Wildlife Gardening Forum, The Wildlife Trusts, Whale and Dolphin Conservation, Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust, Woodland Trust.  There are more who have signed onto the actual notice: River Action, Badger Trust, , Mammal Society, Wild Justice, National Trust, Bumblebee Conservation.
  2. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill was introduced in Parliament on 11 March 2025. The Bill would amend environmental laws such as The Habitats Regulations, The Wildlife & Countryside Act, and other protections for nature.
    1. The Bill introduces new Environmental Development Plans, which would allow developers to pay a Nature Restoration Levy instead of complying with environmental protection laws, allowing development to go ahead. The levy would be invested by Natural England in projects that improve nature in line with strategic compensation measures set out in the Environmental Delivery Plans. Such a model poses several problems including: the lack of resource for Natural England to deliver this effectively and the fact that such compensation measures wouldn’t work for some species and sites such as dormice where there are limited opportunities to create restoration elsewhere. However, they say that the Government’s proposals need stronger safeguards to ensure they do not allow unsustainable development.
  3. Data on species loss in MP constituencies can be found here.
    1. Note: Much of the data referenced is drawn from sources with significant citizen science input, including the National Biodiversity Network Atlas, the National Water Vole Monitoring Programme (People’s Trust for Endangered Species), and other volunteer-driven reporting schemes. Recording effort can vary significantly by year. Notably, 2020 saw unusually high levels of species reporting, likely influenced by increased public engagement with nature during COVID-19 lockdowns. Our comparison therefore looks over a longer time period, with the data aligning with longer-term trends of wildlife decline documented in robust national analyses such as the State of Nature 2023 report.
    2. In most of the species we have looked at the Atlas has far lower numbers pre-2000. This is likely to be due to lack of resources for sharing more historic records and higher uptake and engagement with biological recording/citizen science projects in the last 25 years. Comparison to current recording levels are therefore set from the most significant trend point bearing these limitations in mind.

    Share this page

    Share on Facebook   Tweet this   Share on LinkedIn


    Latest Press Releases